Federal Circuit· 9/10/2010

Wanless v. Shinseki

Citations

618 F.3d 1333
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18899
2010 WL 3516442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ decision maintaining plaintiff’s reduction in disability benefits due to his status as an incarcerated felon
explaining that “[a]bsent a constitutional is- sue . . . we lack the jurisdiction to ‘review’” either “‘a chal- lenge to a factual determination, or . . . a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case’” (quoting 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2))
Secretary's interpretation of statutory language is entitled to deference \only in so far as it has the 'power to persuade'\ (quoting Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944))
applying this principle in the statutory interpretation context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Bryson, Gajarsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.