Wanless v. ILLINOIS HUMAN RIGHTS COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Commission’s interpretation of the Human Rights Act is “accorded substantial weight and deference” by reviewing courts because its interpretation “flows directly from its expertise and experience with the statute that it administers and enforces”
• Commission’s interpretation of the Human Rights Act is “accorded substantial weight and deference” by reviewing courts because its interpretation “flows directly from its expertise and experience with the statute that it administers and enforces”
• appellate court affirmed -6- 1-04-1928, 1-04-2112 (consol.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).