Wang v. Department of Public Institutions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing the breadth of “relate to or connect with” with the narrower “necessarily entails” (citation omitted)
• finding this argument “persuasive” but declining to “definitively decide this constitutional issue” because the district court in that case submitted the duration and recency questions to the jury
• rejecting argument that Kentucky’s definition of “traffic” is overly broad because it includes “dispensing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).