Wanex v. Provident State Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in post-judgment garnishment, adequate notice of the garnishment is afforded when defendant attempts to retrieve his assets and discovers they have been frozen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cynthia McCahey v. L.P. Investors, Allen M. Rosenthal, Affiliated Credit Adjusters, Sheriff of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Clerk
  Second Circuit· 1985-09-30· cited 43×
• Reigh v. Schleigh
  D. Maryland· 1984-10-29· cited 11×
• Flat Iron Mac Associates v. Foley
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-03· cited 11×
• Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander v. Gerhold
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-05· cited 6×
• Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Andrews
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-10-01· cited 6×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-29· cited 2×
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 1997-03-26

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fuentes v. Shevin
  Supreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
• Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,797×
• Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1924-11-17· cited 151×
• Hanner v. DeMarcus
  Supreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 27×
• Moya v. DeBaca
  D. New Mexico· 1968-07-19· cited 22×
• Knight v. DeMarcus
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-29· cited 14×
• Halpern v. Austin
  N.D. Georgia· 1974-11-20· cited 14×
• Katz v. Ke Nam Kim
  D. Hawaii· 1974-07-23· cited 10×
• Hanner v. DeMarcus
  Supreme Court· 1967-11-06· cited 4×
• HOUSE v. UNITED STATES Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 2×