Wanetick v. Mel's of Modesto, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 9 “[a]side from narrowing the series of misrepresentations to a period of ten months, Plaintiff does 10 not identify the time . . . of the allegedly fraudulent communications” and thus “fails to satisfy 11 [Rule 9(b)’s] particularity requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).