· 6/23/2005
Wandrey v. Etchison
Citations
- 210 S.W.3d 892
- 363 Ark. 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that nunc pro tunc orders are not the appropriate remedy to correct attorney errors
- where there was no evidence that a faxed notice of appeal had ever been received by the clerk's office, proof by way of a fax confirmation sheet and attorney's affidavit was not sufficient to prove filing
- where there was no evidence that a faxed notice of appeal had ever been received by the clerk’s office, proof by way of a fax confirmation sheet and attorney’s affidavit was not sufficient to prove filing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tom Glaze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.