Skip to main content
· 6/23/2005

Wandrey v. Etchison

Citations

  • 210 S.W.3d 892
  • 363 Ark. 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that nunc pro tunc orders are not the appropriate remedy to correct attorney errors
  • where there was no evidence that a faxed notice of appeal had ever been received by the clerk's office, proof by way of a fax confirmation sheet and attorney's affidavit was not sufficient to prove filing
  • where there was no evidence that a faxed notice of appeal had ever been received by the clerk’s office, proof by way of a fax confirmation sheet and attorney’s affidavit was not sufficient to prove filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.