Skip to main content
· 2/23/2006

Wanda L. Ashman v. Richard Barrows, Janine Jensen, and Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Citations

  • 438 F.3d 781
  • 24 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 186
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 4303
  • 2006 WL 407889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • citing, inter alia, McGreal v. Ostrov, 368 F.3d 657, 677 (7th Cir. 2004)
  • \We are particularly leery of resolving issues involving a state of mind on summary judgment.\
  • \We are particularly leery of resolving issues involving a state of mind on summary judgment.\
  • “It seems clear that this is a case in which summary judgment is inappropriate. The record is replete with incidents which are open to interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Bauer, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.