Wanda Henke v. United States Department of Commerce and National Science Foundation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \the determination that a system of records exists triggers virtually all of the other substantive provisions of the Privacy Act\
• observing that “the determination that a system of records exists triggers virtually all of the 12 other substantive provisions of the Privacy Act”
• expressing concern that if retrieval capability creates a system of records, an agency may be “found retrospectively to be maintaining a system of records it did not even know existed, simply by dint of a potential use it neither engaged in nor contemplated”
• “[A] group of records should generally not be considered a system of records unless there is actual retrieval of records keyed to individuals.”
• “the determination that a system of records exists triggers virtually all of the other substantive provisions of the Privacy Act”
• “[A] group of records should generally not be considered a system of records unless there is actual retrieval of records keyed to individuals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).