Wanda GREGORY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a claimant was able to work 12 with the same condition now argued to be disabling, the ALJ did not err in finding plaintiff not 13 disabled
• observing that a claimant’s health condition “had remained constant for a number of years . . . [but] had not prevented her from working over that time”
• finding that substantial 24 evidence supported determination that claimant’s back problems were not 25 disabling where her condition remained constant for several years and the 26 impairment had not prevented her from working during that time
• finding that the claimant’s back problems had remained constant for a number of years and had not prevented her from working, which are substantial evidence to support the decision that the claimant’s back problems did not render her disabled
• approving ALJ’s finding that symptoms were not disabling when they did not prevent the claimant from working in the past
• noting comparison to Thompson, but not directly citing it for the proposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).