Wamser v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the notice requirements of AS 16.05.180 do not apply when a defendant has no constitutionally protected expectation of privacy in the evidence seized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wamser v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1982-10-08· cited 24×
• Dye v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-09-17· cited 12×
• MacKelwich v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-12-19
• Dye v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1983-07-12

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Nathanson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-08-27· cited 28×