Walz v. Tax Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court had a duty to sufficiently investigate a juror’s absence before excusing the juror
• noting that record lacked even \the slightest basis to believe that [the removed] juror was a holdout juror or that the jury had reached any sort of impasse in its deliberations\
• noting that record lacked even “the slightest basis to believe that [the removed] juror was a holdout juror or that the jury had reached any sort of impasse in its deliberations”
• concluding a defendant could not challenge denial of a motion he did not join in the district court
• court was not obligated to contact absent juror or her physician where juror's history of illness and her recent telephone call to court clerk sufficiently established her incapacity
• defendants were on notice of witnesses cooperation with government “midway through the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).