Walutes v. Baltimore Rigging Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding under Maryland law that the service of an attachment creates an inchoate lien that cannot be avoided as a preference if such service occurs prior to the preference period
• interpreting Maryland law as it applied to Section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cox v. General Electric Credit Corp. (In Re Cox)
  D. Maryland· 1981-04-10· cited 43×
• In the Matter of Freedom Group, Incorporated, Doing Business as Metro Metals, Debtor. Freedom Group, Incorporated v. Lapham-Hickey Steel Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-03-14· cited 32×
• Aspen Data Graphics, Inc. v. Boulton (In Re Aspen Data Graphics, Inc.)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-01-19· cited 24×
• In Re Lamm
  E.D. Virginia· 1984-01-17· cited 18×
• Schlossberg v. Finance America Corp. (In Re Krumpe)
  D. Maryland· 1986-04-24· cited 15×
• In Re Wilkinson
  E.D. Virginia· 1996-05-24· cited 13×
• Weaver v. Aquila Energy Marketing, Corp.
  S.D. Texas· 1996-05-20· cited 8×
• Fairweather v. Monument Bank (In re Fairweather)
  D. Maryland· 2014-07-31· cited 3×
• Walutes v. Baltimore Rigging Company
  Fourth Circuit· 1968-02-23· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Metcalf v. Barker
  Supreme Court· 1902-12-01· cited 326×
• Pickens v. Roy
  Supreme Court· 1902-12-01· cited 135×
• Morris W. Haft & Bros. v. Wells
  Tenth Circuit· 1937-12-31· cited 22×
• Buschman v. Hanna
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1889-12-18· cited 17×
• In Re Demountable House Corporation
  S.D. Florida· 1945-02-23· cited 11×
• Thomas v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1887-06-23· cited 7×