Waltzer v. Nisselson (In re Marketxt Holdings Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a creditor’s active participation in a proceeding without complaint could be inferred as implied consent or waiver, but silence would not be; stating, “Silence is not acceptance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).