Walthal v. Rusk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the appellants’ predecessor-in-interest became aware of soil contamination as early as 1997 and certainly no later than 2000, eight years before the action was commenced, and thus that the appellants were barred from bringing their claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).