Skip to main content

Walters v. State

Citations

  • 394 S.E.2d 105
  • 195 Ga. App. 434
  • 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the results of a breath test performed on an Intoximeter 3000 were admissible because the analysis of defendant's breath was created by the machine rather than by the trooper who administered the test
  • holding that the results of a breath test performed on an Intoximeter 3000 were admissible because the analysis of defendant’s breath was created by the machine rather than by the trooper who administered the test
  • an expert’s testing of the Intoxilyzer 3000 device used to test defendant five months after the charged incident was not relevant, as it would not prove that the machine gave an inaccurate reading for defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley, Deen, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.