Walters v. Keebler Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding witness should be allowed to testify absent prejudice, and exclusion of unlisted witness’s testimony is “drastic remedy” to be used only in “most compelling circumstances”
• “[T]he exclusion of an unlisted witness’ testimony is a drastic remedy which should pertain in only the most compelling circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).