Walters v. Keebler Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding witness should be allowed to testify absent prejudice, and exclusion of unlisted witness’s testimony is “drastic remedy” to be used only in “most compelling circumstances”
• “[T]he exclusion of an unlisted witness’ testimony is a drastic remedy which should pertain in only the most compelling circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Medical Logistics, Inc. v. Marchines
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-29· cited 6×
• Cedar Hammock Fire Dept. v. Bonami
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-07· cited 6×
• Ryan's Family Steakhouse v. Whitlock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-18· cited 2×
• Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Castro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-04· cited 1×
• Bombardier Aerospace Corp. v. Signature Flight Support Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-11· cited 1×
• Westerly v. King
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-20· cited 1×
• American Airlines v. Hennessey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-23
• Irving v. Ametek, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-07
• MICHAEL JOHN CRECELIUS v. MILDRED RIZZITANO, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ROBERT ANTHONY ALVES, JR.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-02-27

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Binger v. King Pest Control
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-16· cited 187×
• Martin Company v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1961-07-26· cited 73×
• Rose v. Madden & McClure Grove Service
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-10· cited 5×
• Calleyro v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-29· cited 5×
• Zales Corp. v. Clark
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-06· cited 1×