Walters v. Dorian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations that a person received \increased compensation based on the volume of business enlarged by the alleged fraudulent activity\ was sufficient to plead a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act
• collecting cases, discussing sufficiency of allegations that defendant received compensation or bene-fitted employer with fraud while employed and allowing claims to proceed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).