Walter Ziniga v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The patentee] failed to carry its burden of convincing the jury that it had performed affirm- ative acts in compliance with § 287.”
• “The notice of infringement must therefore come from the patentee, not the infringer.”
• “Absent notice, [defendant’s] ‘knowledge of the patents’ is irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).