Walter Quijada-Aguilar v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we review for substantial evidence the denial of CAT relief
• holding California voluntary manslaughter is not a crime of violence, because a conviction requires “merely reckless conduct”
• explaining that likelihood of torture must be considered in terms of the aggregate risk of torture from all sources
• noting that an “aggravated felony” conviction resulting in a sentence of “at least 5 years” in prison constitutes a “particularly serious crime,” rendering a non-citizen ineligible for withholding of removal
• noting that an “aggravated felony” conviction resulting in a sentence of “at least 5 years” in prison constitutes a “particularly serious crime,” rendering a non-citizen ineligible for withholding of removal
• “CAT claims must be considered in terms of the aggregate risk of torture from all sources, and not as separate, divisible CAT claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).