Walter Manuel Cardona v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying clear error standard to review of fact-finding underlying “foreseeability” criterion
• “[A]n alternative is foreseeable if it is disclosed in the pertinent prior art in the field of the invention” at the time of the amendment
• referring to 344 F.3d 1359 (2003) as \Festo X\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).