Skip to main content
· 3/9/2015

Walter Love v. JP Cullen & Sons, Incorporated

Citations

  • 779 F.3d 697
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3673
  • 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 659
  • 2015 WL 1010091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Title VII liability is limited to a plaintiff's employer
  • explaining that the five-factor test is simply a “more structured” version of control tests employed in other cases (citing EEOC v. Illinois, 69 F.3d)
  • explaining that to maintain a suit under Title VII the worker must have been an employee
  • explaining that the five-factor Knight test applies to analyze whether a putative employer exercised sufficient control
  • applying Knight factors to determine whether contractor or subcontractor or both were plaintiff's employer for Title VII purposes
  • applying Knight factors to determine whether contractor or subcontractor or both were plaintiff’s employer for Title VII purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Manion, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.