Walter H. Dyson v. W. J. Kocik, C. D. Rodgers, W. A. Adams, R. P. Weaverling, Lowell D. Hewitt, Mr. Polte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that if the charge addressed in a disciplinary decision were simpler, \the generalized finding of 'guilty of misconduct as written' would have met the minimum requirements of procedural due process\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).