Walter Eugene Mitchell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[w]here the parties cite no law and provide no analysis of their claims, we do not review such claims’’
• “[assignments of error which are merely mentioned but not briefed beyond a statement of the claim will be deemed abandoned and will not be reviewed by this court” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• refusal to review inadequately briefed claim not included in statement of issues in brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).