Walter E. Heller Western, Inc. v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that despite frequent trips to California for legal work, the pro hac vice residency limitation did not apply because applicant lived in Phoenix, AZ and worked in a Phoenix law firm
• interpreting the words “activities in the state of California” “in an ordinary common sense fashion ... to require that the activities ... covered by the rule be performed ... in California and not elsewhere”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).