Walter E. Heller and Co. v. Pointe Sanibel Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interchangeably using two corporate names during trial did not prove nonparty's right to recover by implication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fickle v. Adkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-10· cited 21×
• RESORTS INTERN., INC. v. Charter Air Center, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-07· cited 12×
• U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Rios
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-10· cited 9×
• Emerson Realty Group, Inc. v. Schanze
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-29· cited 2×
• Chevy Chase Savings & Loan Inc. v. Berkowitz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-10· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dysart v. Hunt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-22· cited 31×
• Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Payne
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-03-09· cited 16×
• Catalfano v. Higgins
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1962-12-17· cited 12×
• Grandin Indus., Inc. v. FLA. NAT. BANK AT ORLANDO
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-09-12· cited 11×
• Hertz International, Ltd. v. Richardson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-07-22· cited 9×
• Stewart v. Preston
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1920-07-10· cited 9×
• American Ladder & Scaffold Co. v. Miami Ventilated Awning Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-02-26· cited 5×
• Mansell v. Foss
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-03-08· cited 5×
• Catalfano v. Higgins
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1962-05-04· cited 3×
• Weisser v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-19· cited 2×
• Vetterick v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-12-23· cited 1×