Walter Coal Co. v. Cuyahoga Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting absence of a “reasoned, factually substantiated [state court] opinion” as one consideration in declining to find a procedural default in objecting to jury selection
• remanding habeas petition to district court for additional fact findings because Court of Appeals was not- well-suited to make factual findings
• remanding habeas petition to district court for additional fact findings because Court of Appeals was not well- suited to make factual findings
• remanding habeas petition to district court for additional fact findings because Court of Appeals was not well- suited to make factual findings
• in context of remand for express purpose of determining whether procedural default had occurred, Appellate Division decision contained “no reasoned, factually substantiated opinion” finding default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).