Walter C. Fiers v. Michel Revel and Pierre Tiollais v. Haruo Sugano, Masami Muramatsu and Tadatsugu Taniguchi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a claim to a genus of DNA molecules not supported by written description of a method for obtaining the molecules
• holding a claim to a genus of DNA molecules not supported by written description of a method for obtaining the molecules
• explaining that the written description requirement of § 112 requires dis- closing more than a mere “wish” or “plan”
• explaining that the written description requirement of § 112 requires dis- closing more than a mere “wish” or “plan”
• determining that a written description requires more than “a mere statement that it is part of the invention[.]”
• \Claiming all DNA[s] that achieve a result without defining what means will do so is not in compliance with the description requirement; it is an attempt to preempt the future before it has arrived.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).