Skip to main content
· 3/9/2020

Walter Ansley v. Banner Health Network

Citations

  • 459 P.3d 55
  • 248 Ariz. 143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The contract itself would hardly seem ambiguous, since, by particularizing the things included, steps, platforms, and courses, it excluded all things not enumerated.”
  • “The contract itself would hardly seem ambiguous, since, by particularizing the things included . . . it excluded all things not enumerated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.