Skip to main content
· 12/19/1879

Walsh v. The Carl Haasted

Citations

  • 29 F. Cas. 105
  • 1879 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that contractual clause providing that contract “constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto” is an “unambiguous merger clause”
  • finding that contract for sale of property and “all prior agreements relating to the sale of the property” shared the same subject matter
  • establishing the soundest rule for the Virgin Islands due to the consistency between case law in the Virgin Islands and other jurisdictions
  • requiring the plaintiff to demonstrate an agreement, a duty created by that agreement, a breach of that duty, and damages
  • establishing these elements as the soundest standard for the Virgin Islands due to the consistency between case law in the Virgin Islands and other jurisdictions
  • adopting the following four elements underlying a breach of contract claim: “(1) an agreement; (2) a duty created by that agreement; (3) a breach of that duty; and (4) damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nixon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.