Skip to main content
· 10/12/1971

Walsh v. TATE

Citations

  • 444 Pa. 229
  • 282 A.2d 284
  • 1971 Pa. LEXIS 782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing 1968 amendment to Pennsylvania Constitution removing constitutional status formerly accorded the Philadelphia Register of Wills
  • discussing 1968 amendment to Pennsylvania Constitution removing constitutional status formerly accorded the Philadelphia Register of Wills
  • “[T]he Register of Wills performs a judicial function and is closely integrated into the judicial branch of govern-ment_”
  • “[W]here a conflict exists between a specific constitutional provision, which is unquestionably applicable to a particular case, .and certain general provisions, which, were it not for' such conflict, might apply, the specific provision will prevail.”
  • “[W]here a conflict exists between a specific constitutional provision, which is unquestionably applicable to a particular case, and certain general provisions, which, were it not for such conflict, might apply, the specific provision will prevail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Barbieri, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.