Skip to main content
· 11/26/1883

Walsh v. Preston

Citations

  • 109 U.S. 297
  • 3 S. Ct. 169
  • 27 L. Ed. 940
  • 1883 U.S. LEXIS 973

Syllabus

<p>Equity — Final Decree — Jurisdiction—Texas.</p> <p>Prior to 1844, the Congress of Texas authorized contracts to be made for settling emigrant families on vacant lands to be designated in the contracts. Subsequently, that Congress passed an act to repeal this law, and presented it to the President of Texas for his signature. He vetoed the repealing act. Congress then passed it over the veto. While the repealing act was thus suspended, the President contracted with- one Mercer and associates to settle families on a designated tract, capable of identification. Preston, the appellant in one suit and appellee in the other, was assignee under Mercer. In February, 1845, the Congress of Texas enacted that on failure of the associates to have the tract surveyed and marked by the first day of the next April, the contract should be forfeited. In October following suit was begun to have the contract annulled for non-compliance with these provisions. A decree was entered declaring it forfeited, but it did not appear that proper-service of the subpoena, or other process or notice, was made to give the court jurisdiction. After lapse of several years,.suit was brought against the commissioner of the land office of Texas to obtain certificates for location of land for which claim was made under the contract, either within the limits of the grant, or in case the land there had been appropriated, then land of equal value elsewhere. The bill also prayed for an injunction to restrain the commissioner from issuing patents for lands outside the grant, until the claims under the contract should be satisfied. The defendant denied the principal allegations of the bill, and demurred on the ground that the State of Texas had not been made a party, averring that it was a necessary party. The court below found for the plaintiff on the facts, and made a decree enjoining the commissioner and his subordinates forever from issuing patents within the boundaries of the contract tract except to Pre

Judges: Millee, Harlan, Field

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.