Walsh v. National Westminster Bancorp., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where retaliatory conduct discussed in a plaintiff’s EEOC charge “lack[ed] any sexual dimension,” the plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to her sexual harassment claim
• dismissing Title VII sexual harassment claim where plaintiff marked box for retaliation but not sex discrimination
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction where “neither party has cited any New York cases on this issue”
• “Even after considering the language in the EEOC charge as liberally as possible, it is not reasonable to conclude that it would prompt an investigation of the plaintiffs earlier [sexual harassment] complaints about [a co-worker].”
• sex discrimination claim not reasonably related to claim of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).