Walsh v. Kenny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a federal district court must dismiss a state habeas petitioner's writ containing both unexhausted and exhausted claims
• holding that a federal habeas court ordinarily should not adjudicate a “mixed” petition, i.e., one containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims
• holding that a federal habeas court ordinarily should not adjudicate a “mixed” petition, i.e., one containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims
• holding that district court should dismiss, without prejudice, habeas petition containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims
• holding that a district court must dismiss habeas petitions containing any claims that have not been exhausted in state court
• holding that district courts ordinarily must dismiss a § 2254 petition without prejudice if the petitioner has not exhausted his state postconviction remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).