Walsh v. Finley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The jury had to, and did - 28 - 1-18-2200 & 1-18-2201, Cons. resolve this conflict in the testimony. Under these conditions, the circumstantial evidence in connection with the case *** became a significant, if not a crucial factor ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).