Walsh v. Cusack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the recent amendment to section 1602-C requiring that judgments state the rate of post-judgment interest does not alter the “long-standing practice” that a party is entitled to such interest absent a waiver thereof
• concluding that the recent amendment to section 1602-C requiring that judgments state the rate of post-judgment interest does not alter the \long-standing practice\ that a party is entitled to such interest absent a waiver thereof
• holding that Walsh was entitled to post-judgment interest on child support arrearage, but vacating and remanding the arrearage judgment because the judgment did not state the interest rate or specify that the interest was fully or partially waived as required by section 1602-C
• holding that Walsh was entitled to post-judgment interest on child support arrearage, but vacating and remanding the arrearage judgment because the judgment did not state the interest rate or specify that the interest was fully or partially waived as required by section 1602-C

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).