Walsh v. Barry-Harlem Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Physician or Hospital statute is more specific than the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/ et seg., because it applies only to medical malpractice actions
• holding the medical malpractice limitation statute more applicable than the limitations period contained in the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 12U/2, par. 270a(e)
• section 13 — 212 limitations barred consumer fraud claim alleging physicians intentionally misrepresented test results and performed unnecessary surgery on plaintiffs eyes
• the plaintiff's additional medical expenses and emotional distress resulting from unnecessary eye surgery were injuries arising out of patient care because surgeons made a medical judgment that plaintiff did not need the surgery but operated anyway
• the plaintiff’s addi- tional medical expenses and emotional distress resulting from unnecessary eye surgery were injuries arising out of patient care because surgeons made a medical judgment that plaintiff did not need the surgery but operated anyway

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).