WALSDORF SHEET METAL WORKS v. Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a party may not complain about the failure to appoint an expert medical advisor when a request for appointment is not made \with reasonable timeliness\
• holding motion for EMA made for first time at close of final hearing was untimely where parties knew of disagreement between health care providers five months before hearing
• request made at the conclusion of the merits hearing, after final argument, more than five months after the conflict in medical opinion became apparent
• motion for appointment of EMA to be made “with reasonable promptness after the disagreement between health care providers [has] surfaced”
• untimely at five months when requested at close of final hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).