Skip to main content
· 12/15/2010

Wallshein v. SHUGARMAN

Citations

  • 50 So. 3d 89
  • 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1259
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19083
  • 2010 WL 5093260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not need to conduct an evidentiary hearing when the dispute could be resolved as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross, Farmer, Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.