Walls v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• probationary requirement that defendant maintain full-time employment of at least $35 a week was sufficiently egregious to equate with fundamental error and, thus, to withstand failure to object

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tory v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-26· cited 25×
• Armstrong v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-02· cited 16×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-23· cited 15×
• Vezina v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-07· cited 13×
• Gregory v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-31· cited 13×
• Mathis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 9×
• James Tindal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-20· cited 9×
• Reed v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-13· cited 5×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-05· cited 3×
• McCord v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-14· cited 2×
• Trapp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-06· cited 1×
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-03
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-08

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Larson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 90×
• Kord v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-10· cited 20×
• Boudreaux v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-22· cited 9×
• Cowan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-24· cited 4×