Walls v. Pierce County Sheriff'S Dept.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that dismissal is appropriate once it became apparent that the debtor did not have the means to pay the amounts necessary to confirm a plan
• finding debtor’s inability to propose a viable plan to be an unreasonable delay that is prejudicial to creditors and thus warranted dismissal of the case
• continuation of case when debtor cannot propose a confirmable debt adjustment plan constituted prejudicial delay to creditors under 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1)
• “Section 1307(c) provides that cause includes ‘unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors’ and ‘denial of confirmation of a plan under section 1325 of this title.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).