Walls v. Hodo Chevrolet Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was appropriate to place the burden on the employer to not only prove the existence of a pre-existing condition for purposes of apportionment but to present medical evidence that the pre- existing disease contributed to the employee’s disability
• concluding that it was appropriate to place the burden on the employer to not only prove the existence of a pre-existing condition for purposes of apportionment but to present medical evidence that the pre-existing disease contributed to the employee’s disability
• “However, it is also the general rule that a claimant may not pyramid benefits and receive in excess of the maximum weekly benefits provided by statute during any one period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).