Walls v. Brewster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a case after a party failed to diligently SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 9 (0) 1 947A <0 oppose a motion to dismiss
• recognizing that while an attorney's illness may be the basis for a claim of excusable neglect in failing to file an opposition, such excuse does not extend to cocounsel who could have filed the opposition
• recognizing that while an attorney's illness may be the basis for a claim of excusable neglect in failing to file an opposition, such excuse does not extend to cocounsel who could have filed the opposition
• recognizing that while an attorney's illness may be the basis for a claim of excusable neglect in failing to file an opposition, such excuse does not extend to cocounsel who could have filed the opposition
• holding that dismissal with prejudice for want of prosecution before two years had passed was appropriate where plaintiff failed to complete arbitration within one year, as required by NAR 12(B), and failed to oppose defendant's motion to dismiss after receiving two extensions
• holding that dismissal with prejudice for want of prosecution before two years had passed was appropriate where plaintiff failed to complete arbitration within one year, as required by NAR 12(B), and failed to oppose defendant's motion to dismiss after receiving two extensions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).