Wallis v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lower court’s judgment must be upheld on any correct legal theory before it, even if court gave an incorrect reason for the judgment
• holding that lower court’s judgment must be upheld on any correct legal theory before it, even if court gave an incorrect reason for the judgment
• holding that lower court = s judgment must be upheld on any correct legal theory before it, even if court gave an incorrect reason for the judgment
• providing that we “must” analyze the sufficiency of the evidence “in light of the jury charge . . . [given] without objection”
• noting that allocation of damages is central to the insured’s claim
• affirming the judgment notwithstanding verdict because the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the jury’s finding on the amount of dam ages caused solely by the covered peril

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).