Walling v. Phillips & Buttorff Mfg. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “defendant must have actually put the trade secret to some commercial use” in order for plaintiff to recover for misappropriation
• “Because the defendants failed in their marketing efforts, no actual profits exist by which to value the worth to the defendants of what they misappropriated.”
• referring to “prices past purchasers or licensees may have paid”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).