Walling v. Lippold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insured stated a claim where the insurer paid less than the amount of total medical expenses despite knowing the actual cost of plaintiff's medical expenses
• explaining that in North Carolina, a breach of contract claim requires a valid contract and breach thereof
• alleging that the insurer undervalued the claim despite being provided with the medical documentation necessary to establish his losses
• finding that a comparable provision showed that the insurer did not have to settle the insured’s claim
• noting that the arbitration panel determined the plaintiffs claim to be worth $2.5 million
• finding this element to be satisfied where the insurer allegedly “misrepresented pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).