· 5/7/1909
Walleston v. Fahnestock
Citations
- 116 N.Y.S. 743
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[t]here may be important questions 16 of ordinary preemption, but those are for the state courts to decide upon remand”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.