Waller v. Dunnaho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although plaintiff in a replevin action was entitled to the $255 that was found on the table in front of him during a cash poker game, he was not entitled to the $8 pot \in play\ on the table when the raid took place

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).