Court of Appeals of Virginia· 3/31/1998
Waller v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 497 S.E.2d 508
- 27 Va. App. 71
- 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A document is considered filed when delivered to the clerk for filing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willis, Bray, Annunziata
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-07-21· cited 959×
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1975-10-10· cited 746×
- Blain v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-09-06· cited 375×
- Langhorne v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-09-17· cited 93×
- Gray v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-04-18· cited 42×
- Woodward v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-06-29· cited 28×
- Mostyn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-07-28· cited 18×
- Stokes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-01-02· cited 17×
- Carter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-03-26· cited 15×
- Harshaw v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-03-09· cited 11×
- Rhem v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-12-05· cited 10×
- Bottoms v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-06-06· cited 8×
- Charles Rosser v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-03-11· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.