Wallen v. Nebraska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing examples of similar language in correspondence indicating “beyond cavil” that parties did not intend to be bound
• “As the Supreme Court observed in United States v. Line Material Co., ‘[p]ublic policy has condemned monopolies for centuries.’ [333 U.S. 287, 308 (1948
• “New York follows the generally accepted rule that when parties negotiating a proposed contract express an intent not to be bound until their negotiations have culminated in the execution of a formal contract, they cannot be held bound until that event has occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).