Skip to main content
· 4/15/1807

Wallace v. Taylor

Citations

  • 29 F. Cas. 83
  • 1 Cranch 393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a subsequent action arises out of the same transaction or occurrence when that action “relies on the same group of operative facts giving rise to the assertion of relief as the earlier claim or claims”
  • discussing the requirements that must be present in order to apply doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel in the Virgin Islands
  • “Res judicata, also known as claim preclusion, precludes relitigation of ‘any claims that were raised or could have been raised in a prior action.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.